01In brief
The Moshavim Movement (Hebrew: Tenu'at ha-Moshavim) is a national umbrella organization representing cooperative agricultural villages across Israel. Founded in the mid-1930s to address the needs of existing moshavim and help establish new ones, it became a central national framework for the moshav sector. Published reports use different membership figures: JNS reported in March 2021 that the movement represented 450 villages and communities, while Calcalist reported in July 2022 that it encompassed 254 moshavim.
02Overview
A moshav is an Israeli village organized as an economic cooperative in which each member family has a plot intended primarily for agriculture.[5] Moshavim function as both cooperative societies with shared economic functions and municipal units with a general meeting and local committee.[6] Most belong to regional councils alongside kibbutzim.[6]
Two main types of moshav exist. In moshavim ovdim (workers' moshavim), the family or household is the basic unit of production and consumption, while members cooperate in purchasing supplies and marketing produce. In moshavim shitufim (collective moshavim), consumption remains family-based but production and marketing are collective, and land is worked collectively rather than allotted to individual households.[7] As of 1986, the moshav ovdim model was by far the more prevalent, with 405 of the 448 moshavim then counted falling into that category.[7] Moshavim also provided services including credit, marketing, and the purchase of agricultural supplies.[7]
Residents who are not cooperative members also live in moshavim, so a moshav's total population may exceed its formal cooperative membership.[5]
03Origins and Early History
The moshav cooperative form emerged in the early 1920s.[8] Nahalal, a pioneering moshav ha'ovdim, was established on September 11, 1921, in the northern Jezreel Valley, with 80 founding families each receiving 25 acres of land.[9] Some of its founders had previously belonged to Kibbutz Degania but preferred a cooperative framework to a fully communal one.[10] Nahalal's founding principles included national land leased to settlers, independent family work, mutual assistance, and cooperative buying and selling — a form that sought to combine some communal principles of the kibbutz with family farming.[9] Kfar Yechezkel followed later that year.[1]
Nahalal's distinctive circular plan, designed by architect Richard Kaufman, placed public buildings at the center, homes in the next ring, and gardens and fields in the outer ring — a layout that became a model for other moshavim.[9] Moshe Smilansky was among those who helped launch and lead the early moshav movement.[11]
Tenu'at ha-Moshavim, the Moshav Movement, was formally founded in the mid-1930s to address problems faced by existing moshavim, to shape and preserve their social structure, and to assist in establishing additional settlements.[1] Its creation was a response to the accumulated needs of the moshav sector rather than the founding of the moshav form itself.[1]
04Practice and Internal Organization
To advance its aims, the movement developed a range of economic, financial, and service institutions. These included a mutual assistance fund, a bank, savings and pension arrangements, a mutual insurance company, a mortgage bank, and regional purchasing organizations.[1] Those regional organizations typically grouped 30–50 moshavim and arranged both marketing and the supply of agricultural inputs.[1] Working in cooperation with local councils, they also established facilities such as citrus-canning and fodder plants, slaughterhouses, fruit-packing plants, egg-sorting warehouses, and cold-storage plants.[1]
Beyond economic infrastructure, the movement maintained departments dealing with education, culture, social activities, and internal arbitration, as well as departments providing agricultural and organizational advice and training and supporting the absorption of new settlers.[1] It also had a youth section and published periodicals.[1]
Rabbi Menachem Cohen, a Member of Knesset and Labor Party member, served at one point as the movement's rabbi.[12] The movement's leadership was historically connected to Mapai and the broader Labor movement.[2]
05Significance and Growth After Israeli Statehood
Israeli independence in 1948 brought an influx of new immigrants, many arriving as families or whole communities without the agricultural preparation of earlier pioneers. The family-based moshav proved a suitable framework for settling these newcomers, and 250 new moshavim were established between 1949 and 1956 alone.[1] Hundreds of veterans from older moshavim helped recruit newcomers, establish settlements, and guide new settlers through the process.[1]
This rapid expansion transformed the movement's internal composition. A historical account estimated that by 1970 roughly 70% of the movement's affiliated moshavim had been established after statehood.[2] The growth of the immigrant moshavim created new political and representative pressures within the movement, as leaders from newer settlements sought greater standing alongside those from older, veteran moshavim.[2]
The scale of this expansion is reflected in the membership figures. In 1966, there were 365 moshavim with a total population of 126,000, most belonging to the Moshav Movement or to the moshav union of Ha-Po'el ha-Mizrachi.[13] By 1970, 212 moshavim with a combined population of 75,000 were affiliated with Tenu'at ha-Moshavim specifically, out of an overall moshav total of 346 settlements and about 122,000 residents across all moshav organizations.[1] By 1986, the country had 448 moshavim with approximately 156,700 Israelis living and working in them, with the great majority divided among eight federations.[7]
06Leadership and Political Representation
Yitzhak Koren served as the movement's secretary from 1944, working chiefly on the movement's ties with Mapai leaders and settlement institutions.[2] At the movement's tenth conference in 1960, Uzi Feinerman was elected secretary in his place.[2]
The growing weight of the immigrant moshavim within the movement created a demand for more representative leadership. A notable moment came in 1959, when a delegation of immigrant-moshav members met Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and asked for water, poultry, work animals, and tools, warning that some of their settlements risked collapse without this support.[2] The encounter illustrated the precarious material conditions facing many of the newer settlements and the movement's role in channeling their concerns to national leadership.
In 1970, Aharon Ouzan and Aryeh Nahmkin were elected as co-secretaries with equal standing — the first time the movement had shared the position in this way — with the leadership configured to include representatives of both older and immigrant moshavim.[2] Ouzan had joined the movement's secretariat in 1959 and represented the newer immigrant moshavim of the Negev.[2] In 1966 he became the first moshav member to enter the senior leadership of the Ministry of Agriculture, as deputy minister, and in 1974 he became minister of agriculture, saying he would work for all forms of settlement — kibbutz, kvutza, and moshav.[2]
Shalom Simhon later served as the movement's secretary. In March 1998, he supported uniting the moshav movements as a way to strengthen the family farm. A Globes report said the movement's conference was expected to approve a merger with the Agricultural Union, which included 66 cooperative settlements alongside the movement's 250 moshavim; the report described a proposed merger rather than confirming its completion.[14]
07Economic Crisis and Structural Change
The moshav cooperative's structure and rules evolved during the first three decades of statehood but then remained largely stable for nearly thirty years, as Zionist institutions and the state partly insulated moshavim from commodity, labor, capital, and land markets.[8] Government bailouts were recurrent and were often channeled through regional moshav organizations connected to member moshavim through unlimited mutual financial guarantees.[8]
In 1985–86, this structure came under severe stress. Almost all regional moshav organizations became insolvent following the government's stringent anti-inflationary measures.[8] The ensuing crisis hardened the budget constraints facing individual moshavim and accelerated reduced internal cooperation, declining agriculture, occupational diversification, suburbanization, and the loss of municipal autonomy.[8] Many moshav-movement economic organizations responsible for marketing and purchasing inputs also went bankrupt amid overexpansion and high interest rates during the 1980s, weakening the mutual-guarantee arrangements under which members had supported one another.[15]
The social effects were significant. Mounting debts contributed to farm liquidations and the departure of younger residents from some moshavim, particularly in the 1980s.[1] Some moshavim — especially those near central Israel's large population centers — responded by building new neighborhoods and absorbing urban newcomers, while others rented land for commercial use or combined farming with tourism, particularly in the north.[1] By the end of 2008, Israel had 440 moshavim of both types with 258,100 residents, representing about 4% of the country's population.[5] For 2004, the overall moshav population was around 230,000, of whom approximately 206,500 were affiliated with moshavim of Tenu'at ha-Moshavim.[1]
08Contemporary Role and Advocacy
Published accounts have used different figures for the movement's reach. In March 2021, JNS reported that it represented 450 cooperative agricultural villages and communities from Kfar Yuval in the north to Faran in the southern Arava.[3] Secretary-general Amit Yifrah spoke that month at a centenary event attended by President Reuven Rivlin and community representatives from across the country.[3] In July 2022, Calcalist reported that the movement encompassed 254 moshavim. That year it signed an exclusive cooperation agreement with the Olive hotel network to develop rural tourism projects through moshav associations, covering both moshavim with existing tourism plans and those that had not yet begun planning.[4] Yifrah described rural tourism as an important anchor and growth engine for the rural sector.[4]
The movement has also established new moshavim. Be'er Milka, in the Nitzana area of the Negev near the Egyptian border, went onto the land in November 2006 — the first new moshav established in Israel in 15 years at the time. Its initial group of 11 families lived in caravans while permanent homes were planned, and members began farming potatoes, pomegranates, and flowers, with a longer-term plan for 100 residential units and agricultural holdings.[16]
Following the October 7, 2023 attacks, the movement worked with the Knesset, government, the Tekuma Directorate, and donors to seek support for communities close to Gaza, including efforts to fund community-coordinator positions for affected settlements.[17] The movement's youth branch, Bnei Hamoshavim, joined efforts to support a renewed Nahal service track directing groups to agricultural settlements along Israel's southern and northern borders.[18]
09Controversies and Policy Disputes
The movement has participated in contested debates over non-agricultural activity on moshav land. In 2014 it joined a petition to the High Court of Justice challenging restrictions on renting farm buildings for non-agricultural work. It argued that declining agricultural income had led residents to seek supplementary livelihoods in tourism, storage, galleries, and other activities.[19]
The movement also promoted a planning amendment that would allow a third housing unit on moshav farm holdings. In 2015, a planning subcommittee recommended depositing an amendment permitting such a unit under specified conditions. Amit Yifrah described the change as a way to add housing by intensifying existing settlements rather than expanding their built-up areas. Netanya mayor Miriam Feirberg opposed the measure, arguing that it favored the affluent rural sector at the expense of cities and their weaker populations.[20]
During a 2019 dispute over planning and construction enforcement, Yifrah, then head of the movement's land-rights unit, argued that moshav residents faced disproportionate enforcement even as violations were declining. The report also presented government data and other positions in the dispute rather than establishing the movement's claims as fact.[21] During the 2021 debate over extending the law governing the Committee for Preferred Housing Sites, the movement sought limits on planning over agricultural land. Yifrah argued that continued losses might fail to resolve the housing crisis while creating a future food-supply crisis; these were the movement's policy positions within a broader contested debate.[22][23]
Yifrah was also involved in shaping a settlement between Moshav Aminadav and the Israel Land Authority after more than 20 years of disputes over non-agricultural uses. The agreement enabled the regularization of some uses and the promotion of an employment area of about 40 dunams in exchange for NIS 10 million from the moshav's members. The authority said the agreement also required the termination or demolition of uses and structures that remained unapproved.[24]
Sources
- 1Encyclopedia.com, Moshav or Moshav Ovedim, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 2University of Haifa Herzl Institute, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 3Jewish News Syndicate, Israel celebrates 100 years since establishment of first moshav, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 4Calcalist, Vacation in the village: The Moshavim Movement and the Olive hotel network in an exclusive cooperation agreement, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 5Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research, Moshavnik, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 6Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, State-Local Relations in Israel, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 7Library of Congress, Israel: A Country Study, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 8Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, The rise and decline of the Israeli moshav cooperative: A historical overview, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 9Center for Israel Education, Moshav Nahalal Is Founded, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 10The Jerusalem Post, Independence Day: Looking back at our history to prepare for the future, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 11Center for Israel Education, Moshe Smilansky, 1874-1953, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 12Institute for National Security Studies, Debates Surrounding the Conscription of Yeshiva Students in the Early Years Following the Establishment of the State of Israel, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 13Jewish Virtual Library, Cooperatives, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 14Globes, 250 moshavim unite with 66 settlements of the Agricultural Union, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 15Encyclopedia.com, Moshav, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 16Ynet, Be'er Milka – a new moshav went onto the land in the Nitzana area, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 17The Times of Israel, Gaza Border Support, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 18The Times of Israel, Nahal Agricultural Track, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 19Calcalist, The Moshavim Movement joined a petition to the High Court of Justice against the prohibition on renting buildings on moshav farm holdings, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 20Globes, A plan was approved that could add tens of thousands of housing units in moshavim, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 21CTech by Calcalist, Israeli Farmers Claim New Regulation Meant to Target Arabs Is Being Used Against Them, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 22Ynet, The VATMAL law was approved in the Knesset: it will be extended by an additional 4 years, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 23Ynet, Despite the dispute: the ministerial committee approved advancing the VATMAL law, accessed on October 14, 2026.
- 24Calcalist, A way was found to step back from the tree of illegal uses in moshavim, accessed on October 14, 2026.
IsraelPedia Question & Answers
What is the Moshavim Movement?
The Moshavim Movement (Hebrew: Tenu'at ha-Moshavim) is a national umbrella organization representing cooperative agricultural villages across Israel. It was founded in the mid-1930s to address the needs of existing moshavim and help establish new ones, and it became a central national framework for the moshav sector. Published reports use different membership figures, with JNS reporting in March 2021 that it represented 450 villages and communities, while Calcalist reported in July 2022 that it encompassed 254 moshavim.
What is the difference between a moshav ovdim and a moshav shitufi?
In a moshav ovdim (workers' moshav), the family or household is the basic unit of production and consumption, while members cooperate in purchasing supplies and marketing produce. In a moshav shitufi (collective moshav), consumption remains family-based but production and marketing are collective, and land is worked collectively rather than allotted to individual households. As of 1986, the moshav ovdim model was by far the more prevalent, with 405 of the 448 moshavim then counted falling into that category.
What was the first moshav and when was it established?
Nahalal, a pioneering moshav ha'ovdim, was established on September 11, 1921, in the northern Jezreel Valley, with 80 founding families each receiving 25 acres of land. Its founding principles included national land leased to settlers, independent family work, mutual assistance, and cooperative buying and selling — a form that sought to combine some communal principles of the kibbutz with family farming. Nahalal's distinctive circular plan, designed by architect Richard Kaufman, placed public buildings at the center, homes in the next ring, and gardens and fields in the outer ring, and became a model for other moshavim.
How did Israeli independence in 1948 affect the growth of the Moshavim Movement?
Israeli independence in 1948 brought an influx of new immigrants, many arriving as families or whole communities without the agricultural preparation of earlier pioneers, and the family-based moshav proved a suitable framework for settling these newcomers. As a result, 250 new moshavim were established between 1949 and 1956 alone. A historical account estimated that by 1970 roughly 70% of the movement's affiliated moshavim had been established after statehood, and the growth of immigrant moshavim created new political and representative pressures within the movement.
What caused the moshav cooperative system to collapse in the mid-1980s?
In 1985–86, almost all regional moshav organizations became insolvent following the government's stringent anti-inflationary measures. Many moshav-movement economic organizations responsible for marketing and purchasing inputs also went bankrupt amid overexpansion and high interest rates, weakening the mutual-guarantee arrangements under which members had supported one another. The crisis hardened budget constraints facing individual moshavim and accelerated reduced internal cooperation, declining agriculture, occupational diversification, suburbanization, and the loss of municipal autonomy.
What new moshav did the Moshavim Movement establish in 2006, and what made it notable?
Be'er Milka, located in the Nitzana area of the Negev near the Egyptian border, went onto the land in November 2006 and was the first new moshav established in Israel in 15 years at the time. Its initial group of 11 families lived in caravans while permanent homes were planned, and members began farming potatoes, pomegranates, and flowers, with a longer-term plan for 100 residential units and agricultural holdings.
What policy disputes has the Moshavim Movement been involved in regarding land use and housing?
The Moshavim Movement joined a petition to the High Court of Justice in 2014 challenging restrictions on renting farm buildings for non-agricultural work, arguing that declining agricultural income had led residents to seek supplementary livelihoods in tourism, storage, galleries, and other activities. The movement also promoted a planning amendment that would allow a third housing unit on moshav farm holdings, which a planning subcommittee recommended depositing in 2015. During the 2021 debate over extending the law governing the Committee for Preferred Housing Sites, the movement sought limits on planning over agricultural land, with its secretary-general arguing that continued losses might fail to resolve the housing crisis while creating a future food-supply crisis.