01In brief
The Misgav Am hostage crisis was a terrorist attack and hostage-taking at Kibbutz Misgav Am on the night of April 7–8, 1980, when five armed terrorists crossed from Lebanon and seized children in the kibbutz's children's house. The attackers killed kibbutz secretary Sami Shani, and a failed early rescue attempt cost Israeli soldier Eldad Tzafrir his life. After about ten hours, a final assault killed the five terrorists and freed the surviving hostages. Toddler Eyal Gluska was found dead, while four other children were reported wounded, including three-year-old Adi Rappaport. The event later figured in a U.S. debate over a proposed arms-related sale to Iraq and left lasting trauma among members of the kibbutz community.
02Background
Kibbutz Misgav Am is situated on the Israel-Lebanon border in the Galilee.[3] Before the attack, a period of heightened security tension had led the kibbutz assembly to require an adult member to sleep on rotation in each children's house alongside the night-watch arrangements. The kibbutz also maintained an armed night guard and a security squad.[1]
The children's house was a two-story building in the center of the kibbutz, with infants housed on the lower floor and toddlers on the upper floor.[6] The floors were connected only by exterior stairs, so movement between them required going outside. The night watchwoman's adult son and his girlfriend were also visiting her in the building that night.[6]
Sami Shani served as the kibbutz secretary and lived in Misgav Am with his wife Esti and their infant son. Meir Peretz was the kibbutz adult assigned to overnight duty in the upper-floor toddler room, where three-year-old Adi Rappaport was among the children sleeping that night.[1][2]
03Course of Events
During the night between April 7 and 8, 1980, five armed men crossed from Lebanon into Kibbutz Misgav Am.[1] They exploited a stormy night and a malfunction in the security fence to enter undetected. A contemporary commentary later described the infiltration as resulting from a breakdown in the warning system.[4][1] Each attacker carried a rifle and grenades.[1]
The terrorists moved toward the children's house at the center of the kibbutz. At the entrance, they encountered kibbutz secretary Sami Shani, who tried to prevent them from entering; they killed him there.[1] The attackers gathered children and babies on the upper floor and held seven children, including three-year-old Adi and the infant son of Sami and Esti Shani, along with Meir Peretz, the adult on overnight duty.[1][2] Esti Shani hid in a bathroom with the night watchwoman and two infants they had managed to take with them.[1]
The attackers shot Peretz in the leg to immobilize him. Despite his injury, he remained with the frightened children and tried to calm them.[2] Toward morning, the terrorists agreed to allow bottles of milk to be brought in for the hungry children.[2]
Negotiations continued while Israeli military units moved into position around the kibbutz. Residents were ordered to remain indoors and received only fragments of information.[1] Nurit Rappaport, whose daughter Adi was among the hostages, spent the night uncertain whether her daughter was alive. Her husband joined the kibbutz security squad, and a radio with a loudspeaker at his position allowed him to follow the negotiations.[1]
At about 3 a.m., residents heard gunfire that was later identified as the first, failed attempt by Sayeret Golani to enter the children's house.[1] Medic Eldad Tzafrir was killed during that attempt.[2] The standoff continued, with negotiations resuming while troops remained deployed around the building.
At exactly 10 a.m., about ten hours after the crisis began, the army launched another assault.[1] The available accounts describe different units at different stages: Mako identifies Sayeret Golani with the failed early breach, while a Ynet retrospective credits Sayeret Matkal under Uzi Dayan with the final rescue.[1][5] A Jewish Virtual Library history also says Sayeret Golani prepared for the operation and identifies Misgav Am as the first mission in which dogs from the Oket'z unit were deployed against terrorists.[7]
All five terrorists were killed, and the surviving hostages were evacuated.[1][2] Soldiers found two-and-a-half-year-old Eyal Gluska dead inside; a survivor's account says he had been shot during the break-in.[2] Adi, wounded in the shoulder, was flown to Rambam Hospital for surgery. Her father identified her among the children being carried out and accompanied her to the helicopter.[1]
04Casualties and Perpetrators
The three Israeli fatalities were kibbutz secretary Sami Shani, toddler Eyal Gluska, and soldier Eldad Tzafrir.[8][6] All five terrorists were killed.[1] The Jewish Virtual Library reports that four other children were wounded, while survivor accounts specifically identify Adi Rappaport's shoulder wound and subsequent surgery.[3][1]
Sources differ over the terrorists' organizational affiliation. A May 1980 AIPAC legislative update identifies them as members of the Iraqi-supported Arab Liberation Front, and a Maariv retrospective also names the Arab Liberation Front.[4][6] Mako and a Ynet retrospective instead identify the group as the Popular Front.[1][5] The available sources do not reconcile the discrepancy.
The Israeli government chronology and the Jewish Virtual Library terrorism chronology each report three people killed, one of them a child.[9][8] The Jewish Virtual Library's kibbutz entry instead describes the kibbutz secretary and an infant as killed and says four other children were wounded.[3] CAMERA's chronology reports three deaths and 16 wounded.[10] These sources do not explain their differing wounded totals or terminology for the child victim.
A Ma'ariv headline published on April 11, 1980, four days after the attack, read "Misgav Am: Life on the Fence" (משגב עם: חיים על הגדר), framing the community's daily life in terms of its border location.[11]
05Aftermath and Political Repercussions
The attack entered an immediate Israeli debate over security and civilian settlement. In a May 1980 commentary summarized by the American Jewish Committee's Israel Office, former IDF Chief of Staff Haim Bar-Lev argued that the terrorists had entered Misgav Am because of a failure in the warning system but noted that none survived.[4] He contrasted the difficult target at Misgav Am with an easier target in Hebron and argued that the lesson was to avoid creating vulnerable targets rather than to abandon civilian settlement in the West Bank — known by its original, indigenous Jewish name of Judea and Samaria.[4]
The attack also figured in a debate in Washington over a proposed sale of $11.2 million in U.S.-manufactured engines for four Iraqi navy frigates. Protests against the sale were renewed after the Misgav Am attack, which the AIPAC update attributed to the Iraqi-supported Arab Liberation Front. Members of the House of Representatives circulated a letter urging the president to revoke the license and establish safeguards against similar sales.[4] The U.S. Department of State's index to the Foreign Relations of the United States volume for 1977–1980 lists the "Mishgav Am hostage crisis" and directs readers to documents 357 and 360, placing the event in the formal U.S. diplomatic record.[12]
A May 26, 1980, Hadassah News & Analysis article referred to the victims in the children's house as small children and presented their vulnerability as part of the PLO's targeting logic. Its claim that a more helpless target produced a stronger impulse to attack was an attributed political interpretation rather than a neutral account of the incident.[13]
06Impact on the Kibbutz Community
The crisis left lasting psychological effects among survivors and their families. Nurit Rappaport described the helplessness of being ordered to remain indoors while her daughter was held hostage and receiving almost no reliable information. Her husband left with a kibbutz security-squad rifle while she waited through the night.[1]
Three-year-old Adi retained fragments of the experience. Her mother recalled that Adi remembered a man wearing a bandanna and repeatedly asked what he was holding. For a prolonged period after the attack, she was afraid of soldiers and startled by loud noises.[1]
The kibbutz did not immediately end communal children's sleeping. The children returned to the children's house, and almost two years passed before the community completed an orderly transition to family sleeping. Rappaport said the change was deliberately managed rather than made in haste or panic after the attack.[1]
A Ynet retrospective described the event as a lasting trauma for those involved.[5] In a later interview, resident Arie Gido described the building's separated floors, exterior staircase, and division between infants and toddlers, preserving the physical context in which the hostage crisis unfolded.[6]
07Historiography and Legacy
The Misgav Am operation holds a documented place in the history of Israeli counterterrorism. A Jewish Virtual Library account identifies it as the first mission in which dogs from the Oket'z unit were deployed against terrorists.[7] Accounts of the rescue identify Sayeret Golani with the initial failed breach and Sayeret Matkal under Uzi Dayan with the successful later assault.[1][5]
The crisis also entered U.S. diplomatic and legislative records. The State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States index lists the incident by name, while the AIPAC legislative update shows that it was invoked in congressional opposition to a proposed arms-related sale to Iraq.[12][4]
Decades after the attack, a Palestinian Authority television clip displayed an image captioned "The heroes of the Misgav Am operation," according to a 2013 Palestinian Media Watch report prepared for Canadian parliamentarians.[14] The report presented the clip as one example in its broader allegation that Palestinian Authority institutions glorified terrorists.[14]
The attack appears in terrorism chronologies maintained by the Israeli government, the Jewish Virtual Library, and CAMERA.[9][8] CAMERA's chronology likewise records it among attacks on Israeli and Jewish targets.[10] Across these records, the targeting of the kibbutz children's house remains a defining feature of the event, while survivor accounts preserve the experiences of the children, parents, and kibbutz members caught in the crisis.[1][2]
08Controversies
The principal unresolved discrepancy concerns the terrorists' organizational affiliation. The AIPAC legislative update and Maariv identify the Iraqi-supported Arab Liberation Front, while Mako and Ynet identify the Popular Front.[4][6] The consulted sources do not establish whether this reflects differing factional identifications, contemporary confusion, or a reporting error.[1][5]
Accounts of the rescue emphasize different units, but they can be distinguished by stage rather than treated as necessarily contradictory. Mako identifies Sayeret Golani with the failed attempt at about 3 a.m., while Ynet credits Sayeret Matkal under Uzi Dayan with the later rescue of the hostages.[1][5] The Jewish Virtual Library separately states that Sayeret Golani prepared for the Misgav Am operation.[7]
Casualty reporting also differs in detail. The government and Jewish Virtual Library chronologies report three deaths, including one child.[9][8] The Jewish Virtual Library's kibbutz entry names the kibbutz secretary and an infant and reports four other children wounded, whereas CAMERA gives three deaths and 16 wounded.[3][10] The sources do not reconcile the wounded totals, although the three Israeli fatalities are identified in the verified Maariv retrospective.[6]
Sources
- 1Mako, "There are terrorists in the Rotem toddler house. It's Adi's toddler house", accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 2Ynet, She turned the scene of an attack into her home: "People would pass by here trembling with fear", accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 3Jewish Virtual Library, Misgav Am, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 4The American Jewish Archives, MS-603, Box 62, Folder 6, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 5Ynet, Thriller, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 6Maariv, 44 years since the Misgav Am attack: "We didn't talk about what happened, only after 30 years did it all begin to surface", accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 7Jewish Virtual Library, Background & History of Israel's Special Forces Units, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 8Government of Israel, Israel in Maps, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 9Jewish Virtual Library, Worldwide Terror Attacks on Jewish Targets (1952-2003), accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 10CAMERA, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 11National Library of Israel, Historical Jewish Press, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 12Office of the Historian, Historical Documents, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 13The American Jewish Archives, MS-603, Box 80, Folder 5; Hadassah News & Analysis, accessed on October 16, 2026.
- 14Palestinian Media Watch, accessed on October 16, 2026.
IsraelPedia Question & Answers
What was the Misgav Am hostage crisis?
The Misgav Am hostage crisis was a terrorist attack and hostage-taking at Kibbutz Misgav Am on the night of April 7–8, 1980, when five armed terrorists crossed from Lebanon and seized children in the kibbutz's children's house. The attackers killed kibbutz secretary Sami Shani, and a failed early rescue attempt cost Israeli soldier Eldad Tzafrir his life. After about ten hours, a final assault killed all five terrorists and freed the surviving hostages, though toddler Eyal Gluska was found dead inside and four other children were reported wounded.
How did the terrorists enter Kibbutz Misgav Am undetected?
The five armed attackers exploited a stormy night and a malfunction in the security fence to cross from Lebanon into the kibbutz without being detected. A contemporary commentary later described the infiltration as resulting from a breakdown in the warning system. Each attacker carried a rifle and grenades.
Who were the Israeli fatalities in the Misgav Am attack?
The three Israeli fatalities were kibbutz secretary Sami Shani, who was killed at the entrance to the children's house when he tried to prevent the attackers from entering; toddler Eyal Gluska, who was found dead inside the building after the final assault; and soldier Eldad Tzafrir, a medic killed during the first, failed rescue attempt at around 3 a.m.
Which Israeli military units were involved in the rescue at Misgav Am?
Accounts of the rescue identify different units at different stages of the operation. Sayeret Golani is associated with the initial failed breach at around 3 a.m., while a Ynet retrospective credits Sayeret Matkal under Uzi Dayan with the successful final assault at 10 a.m. that freed the surviving hostages. The Jewish Virtual Library also identifies the Misgav Am operation as the first mission in which dogs from the Oket'z unit were deployed against terrorists.
How did the Misgav Am attack affect the debate over a proposed U.S. arms sale to Iraq?
Protests against a proposed sale of $11.2 million in U.S.-manufactured engines for four Iraqi navy frigates were renewed after the Misgav Am attack, which an AIPAC legislative update attributed to the Iraqi-supported Arab Liberation Front. Members of the House of Representatives circulated a letter urging the president to revoke the license and establish safeguards against similar sales. The incident was also listed by name in the U.S. State Department's index to the Foreign Relations of the United States volume for 1977–1980.
What lasting effects did the Misgav Am hostage crisis have on the kibbutz community?
The crisis left lasting psychological trauma among survivors and their families. Three-year-old Adi Rappaport, who was wounded in the shoulder during the attack, retained fragments of the experience and for a prolonged period afterward was afraid of soldiers and startled by loud noises. The kibbutz did not immediately end communal children's sleeping; the children returned to the children's house, and nearly two years passed before the community completed an orderly transition to family sleeping.
What is the main unresolved discrepancy in accounts of the Misgav Am attack?
The principal unresolved discrepancy concerns the organizational affiliation of the terrorists. The AIPAC legislative update and Maariv identify them as members of the Iraqi-supported Arab Liberation Front, while Mako and a Ynet retrospective identify the group as the Popular Front. The consulted sources do not establish whether this reflects differing factional identifications, contemporary confusion, or a reporting error.