01In brief
Jonathan Danilowitz (1945–2022) was an Israeli LGBTQ rights activist and El Al flight attendant whose landmark legal battle against El Al Israel Airlines produced a 1994 Israeli Supreme Court ruling that established equal workplace benefits for same-sex partners. Born in South Africa and an immigrant to Israel, Danilowitz spent decades organizing and advocating for LGBTQ equality long before his case reached the courts. The Supreme Court's decision in El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. v. Danilovitz (HCJ 721/94) recognized that denying gay partners employment benefits available to heterosexual employees violated the right to equal opportunity at work, setting a precedent that helped advance LGBTQ equality across Israel.
02Early Life and Immigration
Jonathan Danilowitz was born on January 13, 1945, in South Africa, and was raised in a traditional Jewish family.[1] He immigrated to Israel in 1971.[1] He called himself a "good Jewish boy" and said that he did not initially recognize his attraction to men; while in South Africa, he kept those feelings from his family.[1]
After settling in Israel, Danilowitz built a career with El Al Israel Airlines, working first as a flight attendant and eventually rising to the position of senior in-flight service manager.[1] He entered into a long-term relationship with a male partner; the two men lived together, jointly purchased an apartment, and maintained a shared household.[1]
03LGBTQ Activism
Founded in 1975, the Agudah initially functioned more as a support and social group than as a political organization.[2] Danilowitz first encountered the Agudah — the Association for LGBTQ Equality in Israel — that year, after seeing its first advertisement in The Jerusalem Post.[3] He recalled the atmosphere of the era plainly: "Everybody was in the closet. Everybody was afraid of being gay or rather didn't want to be known as gay."[3] He later held leadership roles in the Agudah, serving as its chairman and also chairing its LGBT Task Force.[1][4]
In 1979, Danilowitz organized an Israeli meeting of the World Congress of Gay and Lesbian Jewish Organizations after learning about the international conference while traveling in the United States.[3] The planning proved difficult: two venues canceled their agreements after pressure connected to the Rabbinate's kosher-certification authority, forcing organizers to hold the conference in a wedding hall while presenting themselves as travel agents.[3] The gathering was nonetheless considered a success, and it included what has been described as the first unmasked gay protest in what is now Rabin Square.[3]
Danilowitz founded Tehila, a support group for parents of LGBTQ children, and the Gay Road Runners club.[1]
04The El Al Legal Battle
Danilowitz's legal case against El Al began in 1989, when the airline denied his same-sex partner the second free annual flight ticket provided under El Al's collective bargaining agreement with the Histadrut.[1] Under that agreement, employees received two tickets each year — one for themselves and one for a "spouse" — but El Al interpreted "spouse" to mean an opposite-sex partner.[1] An initial ticket had been granted to Danilowitz's partner as a one-time exception; when a later request was denied, he brought a claim before the Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court.[1]
The Regional Labor Court accepted Danilowitz's claim, relying on the general right to equality in Israeli jurisprudence and the Employment Equal Opportunities Law of 1988, even though that law did not yet expressly mention sexual orientation.[1] El Al appealed. The National Labor Court unanimously rejected the appeal in 1992 and required the airline to provide the disputed ticket for Danilowitz's partner.[1] The Employment Equal Opportunities Law was itself amended in 1992 to include sexual orientation among the prohibited grounds of workplace discrimination.[1]
Because the case raised a constitutional issue, the National Labor Court heard the appeal with a seven-member panel comprising three professional judges and four public representatives from employee and employer sectors.[1] Former National Labor Court president Steve Adler, who sat on the panel, later summarized his view: "People’s private life is their own business, but at the workplace all are equal."[1]
El Al then petitioned Israel's Supreme Court, which rejected the challenge in 1994.[1] The Court held that denying same-sex partners the benefit available to heterosexual employees violated the right to equal opportunity at work.[5] The case is formally cited as HCJ 721/94, El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. v. Danilovitz, reported at 48(5) P.D. 749.[5] In a concurring majority opinion at the Supreme Court, Justice Dalia Dorner argued for a strong principle of equality in private and public relations and discussed changing norms surrounding equal treatment of homosexuals.[6] From the 1989 filing through the 1994 Supreme Court judgment, the dispute moved through three court levels.[1]
05Legacy and Later Life
The 1994 Supreme Court ruling became an important precedent in Israeli LGBTQ legal history.[7] The ruling dealt with equality under a private employment contract and was later contrasted with the Adir Steiner case, which activists viewed as more far-reaching because it involved public-sector benefits.[7] A retrospective account by former National Labor Court president Steve Adler said the judgments influenced workplace culture and were important for the dignity of all people at work.[1]
Danilowitz continued working for El Al for eight years after the Supreme Court ruling before taking early retirement.[8] He authored the autobiography Flying Colors in 2012.[4] In 2020, the city of Tel Aviv awarded him its Yakir Ha'ir honor in recognition of his decades of struggle for LGBTQ rights.[4]
He spent his final years at the Protea Hills retirement community near Jerusalem.[4] Danilowitz died at the age of 77 after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.[4] Reflecting on his legacy in his autobiography, he wrote that he had "played a small role in the way the world views homosexuality."[4]
Sources
- 1The Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem Report profile) (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 2My Jewish Learning (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 3The Jerusalem Post (immigrants and LGBTQ acceptance) (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 4The Jerusalem Post (obituary) (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 5Law Library of Congress, Israel: Spousal Agreements for Couples Not Belonging to Any Religion (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 6Jewish Women's Archive (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 7Jewish Virtual Library (accessed September 18, 2026)
- 8The Jewish Chronicle, The Times of Israel (accessed September 18, 2026)
IsraelPedia Question & Answers
Who was Jonathan Danilowitz?
Jonathan Danilowitz (1945–2022) was an Israeli LGBTQ rights activist and El Al flight attendant whose landmark legal battle against El Al Israel Airlines produced a 1994 Israeli Supreme Court ruling that established equal workplace benefits for same-sex partners. Born in South Africa, he immigrated to Israel in 1971 and spent decades organizing and advocating for LGBTQ equality. The Supreme Court's decision recognized that denying gay partners employment benefits available to heterosexual employees violated the right to equal opportunity at work, setting a precedent that helped advance LGBTQ equality across Israel.
What was Jonathan Danilowitz's role in early LGBTQ organizing in Israel?
Danilowitz first encountered the Agudah — the Association for LGBTQ Equality in Israel — in 1975, after seeing its first advertisement in The Jerusalem Post, and later served as its chairman and chaired its LGBT Task Force. In 1979, he organized an Israeli meeting of the World Congress of Gay and Lesbian Jewish Organizations, an event that included what has been described as the first unmasked gay protest in what is now Rabin Square. He also founded Tehila, a support group for parents of LGBTQ children, and the Gay Road Runners club.
What triggered Jonathan Danilowitz's legal case against El Al Israel Airlines?
The case began in 1989 when El Al denied Danilowitz's same-sex partner the second free annual flight ticket provided under the airline's collective bargaining agreement with the Histadrut. El Al interpreted the word "spouse" in the agreement to mean an opposite-sex partner. An initial ticket had been granted as a one-time exception, but when a later request was denied, Danilowitz brought a claim before the Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court.
How did the Israeli courts rule in the El Al case brought by Jonathan Danilowitz?
The Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court accepted Danilowitz's claim, relying on the general right to equality in Israeli jurisprudence and the Employment Equal Opportunities Law of 1988. The National Labor Court unanimously rejected El Al's appeal in 1992 and required the airline to provide the disputed ticket. When El Al petitioned the Israeli Supreme Court, that court also rejected the challenge in 1994, holding that denying same-sex partners a benefit available to heterosexual employees violated the right to equal opportunity at work. The dispute moved through three court levels from the 1989 filing through the 1994 Supreme Court judgment.
What was the broader significance of the Supreme Court ruling in Danilowitz's case?
The 1994 Supreme Court ruling in El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. v. Danilovitz became an important precedent in Israeli LGBTQ legal history. Former National Labor Court president Steve Adler later said the judgments influenced workplace culture and were important for the dignity of all people at work. The ruling dealt with equality under a private employment contract and was later contrasted with the Adir Steiner case, which activists viewed as more far-reaching because it involved public-sector benefits.
What recognition did Jonathan Danilowitz receive later in his life?
In 2020, the city of Tel Aviv awarded Danilowitz its Yakir Ha'ir honor in recognition of his decades of struggle for LGBTQ rights. He also authored the autobiography Flying Colors in 2012, in which he reflected that he had "played a small role in the way the world views homosexuality." Danilowitz continued working for El Al for eight years after the 1994 Supreme Court ruling before taking early retirement.