← All articles

Total current articles · 2,133

Israeli Cassini-Soldner Coordinate System

Published

01In brief

The Israeli Cassini-Soldner coordinate system is a geodetic projection system that served as the foundational mapping grid for the land of Israel from its origins in the British Mandatory survey era of the 1920s until its replacement in 1998. Built on Cassini-Soldner spheroidal coordinates with a central meridian passing through a major triangulation point near Jerusalem, the system underpinned decades of cadastral and topographic work across the country. New survey regulations issued in June 1998 officially replaced it with the New Israeli Grid (NIG), which introduced the Israel Transverse Mercator (ITM) projection in its place.

02Overview

The Israeli Cassini-Soldner coordinate system was the projection framework of the old Israeli Grid, which dated to 1920. It used Cassini-Soldner spheroidal coordinates with a central meridian passing through a major triangulation point near Jerusalem. Regulations issued in June 1998 replaced the old grid with the New Israeli Grid and its Israel Transverse Mercator projection.[1]

03Origins in the British Mandatory Survey

The old Israeli Grid dates to 1920.[1] During the following decade, the Department of Surveys built an extensive fixed-point and detailed-mapping infrastructure across Palestine.[2]

By 1930, a decade of theodolite work had produced a fixed-point network of remarkable scale. A British report on Palestine published that year recorded 20,873 points with fully computed coordinates, alongside a further 22,898 control points and landmarks fixed by graphic means.[2] The network was organized into principal, third-order, topocadastral, fourth-order, and graphic survey tiers, reflecting the layered precision requirements of different mapping tasks.[2]

Field operations in 1930 alone extended the network substantially. Topocadastral triangulation was carried out in the hill areas, with work conducted between Lake Tiberias and Metullah, between Jerusalem and Hebron, and between Nazareth and Tiberias. During that year, 51 third-order points covering 650 square kilometers and 485 topocadastral points covering 165 square kilometers were established, along with 73 kilometers of traverse lines containing 593 points.[2]

Detailed mapping at the 1:10,000 scale accompanied the triangulation effort. Sheets were produced for parts of the coastal plain, the Carmel range, the Jezreel Valley, and areas near Tulkarem, Bittir, and Bir-el-Zait. By that time, the total area surveyed at that scale reached 5,522,000 dunums, encompassing the maritime plain, the plains of Acre and Esdraelon, and nearly the entire Jordan Valley.[2]

04Practice and Technical Characteristics

The old Israeli coordinate system used Cassini-Soldner spheroidal coordinates. Its central meridian passed through an existing major triangulation point near Jerusalem, tying the grid to a surveyed control point.[1]

While the system served cadastral and topographic needs for decades, the transition to a new grid in the late 1990s revealed certain inherited characteristics that shaped how the replacement was designed. The coordinate-system change involved a shift of 50 kilometres on the y axis and 500 kilometres on the x axis between the old and new grids, with meter-level differences that were irregular—amounting to several decimetres in northern Israel and up to several metres in the south.[1]

05Significance

New survey regulations for Israel were officially issued in June 1998, with a central provision replacing the old Israeli Grid with the New Israeli Grid (NIG).[1] The NIG resulted from a readjustment of classical geodetic observations, including Laplace azimuths, horizontal angles, and distances, and introduced the Israel Transverse Mercator (ITM) projection in place of the Cassini-Soldner system.[1]

The ITM projection was designed with continuity in mind. Its parameters were chosen to keep coordinate differences between the old and new grids below one metre across northern Israel—a region containing approximately 95 percent of the population—with the aim of preserving existing grid lines on large-scale maps and remaining usable where approximately one-metre accuracy was sufficient.[1] The new system employed a fictitious central meridian with an arbitrary longitude rather than retaining the old meridian through a physical triangulation point, facilitating the required rotation.[1]

A 2005 Survey of Israel technical paper gives the ITM scale factor as 1.0000067 and describes the value as unusual.[1] The Survey of Israel chose to retain the existing projection and mapping equations rather than revising the parameter as part of another substantial coordinate change. The rationale was practical: a large correction could require transforming all cadastral boundary coordinates and risk creating serious errors if users failed to identify correctly which coordinate system a given point belonged to.[1]

The NIG readjustment was carried through the fourth-order network and encompassed approximately 24,000 triangulation points. The accuracy of a fourth-order point was estimated at better than 10 centimetres standard deviation relative to the nearest first-order point.[1] Coordinates for the top three orders were released in 1993 and were used primarily for governmental cadastral projects; from July 1998 onward, every new geodetic project in Israel was required to comply with the NIG.[1]

06Integration with GPS Technology

The Survey of Israel's GPS-based surveying methodology was built on the NIG framework that superseded the Cassini-Soldner system. Field procedures required at least three control points with NIG coordinates to define a local datum, with free local GPS networks adjusted to those control points using four- or seven-parameter transformations and ITM projection equations.[1] The source states that direct connection to the permanent GPS network, or use of a Virtual Reference Station combined with datum transformations, should yield ITM coordinates for new control points with centimetre-level accuracy.[1]

Sources

  1. 1Surveying and Land Information Science, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2005 (accessed September 18, 2026)
  2. 2British Report On Palestine And Transjordan - Jewish Virtual Library (accessed September 18, 2026)

IsraelPedia Question & Answers

  • What is the Israeli Cassini-Soldner coordinate system?

    The Israeli Cassini-Soldner coordinate system is a geodetic projection system that served as the foundational mapping grid for the land of Israel from its origins in the British Mandatory survey era of the 1920s until its replacement in 1998. Built on Cassini-Soldner spheroidal coordinates with a central meridian passing through a major triangulation point near Jerusalem, it underpinned decades of cadastral and topographic work across the country. New survey regulations issued in June 1998 officially replaced it with the New Israeli Grid, which introduced the Israel Transverse Mercator projection in its place.

  • How extensive was the fixed-point network established under the old Israeli Grid by 1930?

    By 1930, a decade of theodolite work had produced a fixed-point network of remarkable scale. A British report on Palestine published that year recorded 20,873 points with fully computed coordinates, alongside a further 22,898 control points and landmarks fixed by graphic means. The network was organized into principal, third-order, topocadastral, fourth-order, and graphic survey tiers, reflecting the layered precision requirements of different mapping tasks.

  • What were the coordinate differences between the old Israeli Grid and the New Israeli Grid?

    The transition between the two grids involved a shift of 50 kilometres on the y axis and 500 kilometres on the x axis. The meter-level differences between the old and new grids were irregular, amounting to several decimetres in northern Israel and up to several metres in the south.

  • Why was the Israel Transverse Mercator projection designed with a fictitious central meridian rather than retaining the original one?

    The Israel Transverse Mercator projection used a fictitious central meridian with an arbitrary longitude rather than retaining the old meridian through a physical triangulation point in order to facilitate the required rotation. Its parameters were chosen to keep coordinate differences between the old and new grids below one metre across northern Israel, a region containing approximately 95 percent of the population, with the aim of preserving existing grid lines on large-scale maps.

  • Why did the Survey of Israel choose not to revise the ITM scale factor despite it being described as unusual?

    A 2005 Survey of Israel technical paper describes the ITM scale factor of 1.0000067 as unusual, but the Survey of Israel chose to retain the existing projection and mapping equations rather than revise it as part of another substantial coordinate change. The rationale was practical: a large correction could require transforming all cadastral boundary coordinates and risk creating serious errors if users failed to correctly identify which coordinate system a given point belonged to.

  • How accurate were fourth-order triangulation points in the New Israeli Grid readjustment?

    The New Israeli Grid readjustment was carried through the fourth-order network and encompassed approximately 24,000 triangulation points. The accuracy of a fourth-order point was estimated at better than 10 centimetres standard deviation relative to the nearest first-order point.

  • How did GPS-based surveying in Israel integrate with the New Israeli Grid?

    The Survey of Israel's GPS-based surveying methodology was built on the New Israeli Grid framework. Field procedures required at least three control points with New Israeli Grid coordinates to define a local datum, with free local GPS networks adjusted to those control points using four- or seven-parameter transformations and Israel Transverse Mercator projection equations. Direct connection to the permanent GPS network, or use of a Virtual Reference Station combined with datum transformations, was expected to yield ITM coordinates for new control points with centimetre-level accuracy.